PhAI-IDE
PhAI-IDE is a family of models for scientific coding and interaction with tools, available in 4B, 9B, and 72B sizes. Each model is supervised fine-tuned with ms-swift and released as full BF16 weights with the final LoRA adapter merged, together with its configuration and tokenizer.
The training dataset is Codex trajectories, sourced from ScienceIDE.
Models
| Model | Base model | BF16 weights | License |
|---|---|---|---|
| PhAI-IDE-4B | Qwen3.5-4B | 9.08 GB | Apache-2.0 |
| PhAI-IDE-9B | Qwen3.5-9B | 18.82 GB | Apache-2.0 |
| PhAI-IDE-72B | Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct | 145.41 GB | Qwen |
Weight sizes are approximate; inference also requires memory for runtime allocations and the KV cache.
ScienceAccelBench performance
Task-held-out, localized scientific-code repair on familiar codebases, with original numerical verification. Qwen3.5-4B and Qwen3.5-9B are compared with PhAI-IDE-4B and PhAI-IDE-9B, respectively, on identical tasks. Pass rates are percentages; gains are percentage points.
| Size | Environment | Tasks | Qwen3.5 | PhAI-IDE | Gain (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4B | PLUTO-Particles-Dust | 3 | 0.00 | 33.33 | +33.33 |
| 9B | LAPS | 16 | 31.25 | 50.00 | +18.75 |
| 9B | MITgcm-biogeo | 8 | 0.00 | 12.50 | +12.50 |
| 9B | PLUTO-RMHD | 7 | 0.00 | 28.57 | +28.57 |
Comparison with published models
Scores (%), grouped by benchmark and model size. Each reference entry gives its published score and the PhAI-IDE score difference in percentage points. Reference models are approximately the same size: 3–4B, 7–9B, and 67–72B, respectively.
| PhAI-IDE | Benchmark | Score | Reference models: score (difference) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4B | BBH multistep-arithmetic-two | 97.60 | Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct (3.21B): 53.2 (+44.40); Phi-3.5-mini-8k-instruct (3.82B): 95.6 (+2.00) |
| 9B | BBH word-sorting | 60.40 | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (8.03B): 51.2 (+9.20); Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (7.62B): 15.6 (+44.80) |
| 9B | MATH-500 | 92.20 | InternLM3-8B-Instruct (8B): 83 (+9.20); Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (7B): 72.4 (+19.80); Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (8B): 48.4 (+43.80) |
| 72B | AQuA-RAT | 77.56 | Llama-2-70B-Chat (70B): 31.32 (+46.24) |
| 72B | ARC-Easy | 84.64 | Llama-2-70B (70B): 76.5 (+8.14); DeepSeek-LLM-67B-Chat (67B): 81.6 (+3.04) |
| 72B | ARC-Challenge | 64.42 | Llama-2-70B (70B): 59.5 (+4.92); DeepSeek-LLM-67B-Chat (67B): 64.1 (+0.32) |
Reference scores come from the linked publications, model cards, and independent evaluation reports; evaluation settings and sample counts vary by source. Differences describe reported scores across evaluations, rather than matched-protocol head-to-head gains. BBH entries refer to the named tasks.
Quick start
Use Transformers 5.16.1, PyTorch and Accelerate. Set model_id to any model in the table above; the example selects the matching model class.
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoModelForImageTextToText
model_id = "AItonomy/PhAI-IDE-4B"
loader = AutoModelForCausalLM if model_id.endswith("72B") else AutoModelForImageTextToText
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = loader.from_pretrained(model_id, dtype="bfloat16", device_map="auto")
inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain how to verify a numerical simulation."}],
add_generation_prompt=True, enable_thinking=False, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt",
).to(model.device)
output = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=128, do_sample=False)
print(tokenizer.decode(output[0, inputs["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
Training procedure
ScienceIDE demonstrations were collected with GPT-5.6-sol and filtered using a numerical-equivalence verifier. They capture code inspection, tool use, and responses to execution feedback.
All three models use ms-swift supervised fine-tuning with LoRA across trainable linear layers for three epochs. The release merges each final checkpoint's adapter into its base model. Retained assistant targets provide the next-token training signal, while conversation history and tool observations provide context. The trajectories retain the native exec / wait interaction format. Heuristic target masking selects assistant actions for supervision while preserving the surrounding interaction history.
| Shared setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Training dataset | Codex trajectories |
| Training examples / tasks | 4,567 segments / 564 tasks |
| Validation examples / tasks | 544 segments / 81 tasks |
| Train/validation task overlap | 0 |
| Training epochs | 3 |
| LoRA rank / alpha / dropout | 32 / 64 / 0.05 |
| Released weights | LoRA merged into BF16 Safetensors |
Long trajectories are organized into segments. Source partition assignments are preserved, with no task identifiers shared between training and validation.
Framework versions
The release was validated with the following environment.
| Component | Version |
|---|---|
| Python | 3.11 |
| ms-swift | 4.5.3 |
| Transformers | 5.16.1 |
| PyTorch | 2.6.0+cu124 |
| PEFT | 0.20.0 |
| Datasets | 4.8.4 |
| Tokenizers | 0.23.2 |
| Accelerate | 1.14.0 |