/ Модель

Характеристики

Контекст
1 048 576 токенов
Параметры
10,7 млрд
Размер весов
1,4 ГБ
Лицензия
MIT
Архитектура
deepseek_v4 · dense
Базовая модель
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Библиотека
transformers
Опубликована
8 сен 2026

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp-Abliterated

Генерация текстаТекст → текст3 профессии

Overlay-версия DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp с ослабленными отказами для локального диалогового и мультимодального использования.

231скачиваний за 30 дней1лайквеса обновлены11 сен 2026

Бенчмарки

Как модель справилась с задачами пользователей ailist и что о ней публикуют открытые лидерборды

Тесты пользователейпока нет

Никто ещё не опубликовал тест этой модели. Соберите бенчмарк из своих задач — результат появится здесь.

  1. Добавьте модель в бенчмарк

    Вместе с другими моделями категории «Текст» — сравнение идёт внутри одной категории.

  2. Опишите свои задачи

    Напишите запросы, при необходимости приложите файлы и эталонные ответы.

  3. Запустите и опубликуйте

    Модели ответят на каждую задачу, судья оценит ответы. Опубликованный результат появится на этой странице.

Публичные оценки

Из открытых лидербордов. Сравнивайте результаты одного теста при одинаковых условиях — отсутствие оценки не значит, что модель хуже.

В подключённых источниках результатов для этой модели пока нет.

Что умеет модель

Описание составлено по карточке модели и метаданным Hugging Face

Joyfulxp публикует overlay-версию DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp с ослабленным поведением отказов: она предназначена для локального диалогового и мультимодального использования, когда требуется модель, которая чаще отвечает на запросы, отклоняемые исходной версией. Это производная модель на архитектуре DeepSeek-V4 с MoE и 32-слойной башней зрения; в метаданных указаны 10,7 млрд параметров и контекст до 1 048 576 токенов. Overlay меняет 86 тензоров текстовой части, оставляя башню зрения и черновую голову DSpark без изменений, и распространяется в формате safetensors FP8.

Репозиторий не содержит полных весов: для загрузки нужны базовые веса deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp и совместимая сборка vLLM с поддержкой V4. Автор сообщает об улучшении поведения в длинных диалогах относительно предыдущей версии, но проверки ограничены небольшим числом сценариев; общие бенчмарки возможностей не проводились, а одна проблема длинной генерации кода присутствует и в базовой модели. Модель выпущена Joyfulxp под лицензией MIT; README предупреждает, что защитные отказы существенно ослаблены.

Сценарии применения

  • получение ответов на запросы, которые базовая модель обычно отклоняет
  • диалоги с текстовыми и визуальными запросами
  • локальные эксперименты с поведением отказов языковой модели

Ограничения

Общие бенчмарки качества не проводились, а проверки отказов и поведения в диалогах основаны на небольших выборках; длинный контекст за пределами тестов до восьми ходов не валидирован. Для запуска нужны полные веса базовой модели и совместимая сборка vLLM; в длинной генерации кода отмечено расхождение, унаследованное от базы.

Для каких профессий подходит3

Разделы каталога профессий, в задачах которых используется эта модель

Все профессии

Карточка модели

README от автора на Hugging Face, как он его опубликовал

Открыть на Hugging Face

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp — Abliterated (Overlay) — bayes-l2.0 (v2)

📢 v2 update — and an apology for v1

We apologize for the v1 release of this overlay. v1 edited the MTP / DSpark draft head, and in real use this caused garbling in long conversations — despite passing our offline checks. That failure was ours, and fixing it is the core of v2.

Adopting new experience — the community finding that the in-checkpoint draft head should be left untouched; drowzeys/keys-DeepSeekV4Flash-Vision-EXP-ablit is the source of that lesson. The other ablits we consulted (apetersson, s-zaizen) and the cebeuq-style overlay recipe this repo builds on are listed in Sources below. Confirmed by our own follow-up A/B study — v2 no longer edits the MTP head. Together with the re-tuned recipe, this partially resolves the long-dialogue garbling issue: on our 8192-token long-generation ruler the score improves from 2/4 (v1) → 3/4 (v2), and the single remaining divergence is inherited from the unedited base, not caused by the ablation.

Still running v1? Please switch to v2. The fix ships entirely in this repo's model-overlay-00001-of-00001.safetensors + the repointed model.safetensors.index.json.

⚠️⚠️⚠️ THIS REPOSITORY DOES NOT CONTAIN THE FULL MODEL ⚠️⚠️⚠️

This repo ships only the abliteration overlay + repointed index. You MUST first download the original base weights to use it:

Required base: deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp — all 48 shards (model-00001-of-00048.safetensors … model-00048-of-00048.safetensors), ~157 GB.

Setup (3 steps)

  1. Download the original model repo above (48 shards + its model.safetensors.index.json).
  2. Copy this repo's model-overlay-00001-of-00001.safetensors (1.44 GB) and overwrite the base repo's model.safetensors.index.json with this repo's index.
  3. Load the directory with a V4-capable vLLM vision fork (see Serving below).

The overlay only stores the 86 edited tensors; without the base shards the repo cannot load.


⚡ Version 2 (bayes-l2.0) — what changed

This is v2, replacing the earlier v1. The edit recipe was re-tuned and re-validated:

v1 (superseded)v2 — this repo (bayes-l2.0)
Layers edited43 backbone43 backbone (all)
MTP / DSpark draftedited (3 × mtp.*.wo_b)NOT edited
Edited tensors9286
λ2.02.0
Coveragewob (v1)layers.*.attn.wo_b (weight + scale)

Why drop MTP editing: community consensus (e.g. drowzeys) is that editing the in-checkpoint drafter kills DSpark speculative acceptance — and our own 2×2 behaviour study (below) confirmed no benefit from editing MTP, while leaving it untouched keeps DSpark working (draft acceptance measured normal). The result is a cleaner, narrower edit that avoids the draft head.


A decensored (abliterated) rebuild of deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp — a multimodal (vision-language) DeepSeek-V4 MoE model served at native precision across 2× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (96 GB each) with vLLM.

Refusal behaviour was removed from the attention output projections only (layers.*.attn.wo_b, all 43 layers, λ=2.0). Routed + shared experts, wo_a, embeddings, routers, norms, every mHC parameter and the entire 32-layer vision tower + its bias_vl are untouched — the edit is confined to the text path.

This is an overlay, not a re-quantization. Exactly 86 of 72,633 tensors (0.12 %) differ from the base; the other 72,547 are byte-identical. No quantization step anywhere — ships at the base checkpoint's native precision.

⚠️ Uncensored model. Safety refusals have been substantially removed. You are responsible for how you use it. Intended for local/research use on hardware you control. It will attempt almost any request.


Highlights

Basedeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp (DeepSeek-V4 MoE + 32-layer vision tower)
Architecture43 layers, hidden 4096, 256 experts (top-6) + 1 shared, hybrid CSA + HCA attention, mHC hyper-connections, inline 3-stage DSpark draft head; vision tower 32×1024 dim, patch 14, bias_vl
Context1,048,576 native (served here at 524,288)
Precisionunchanged — base checkpoint's native precision (FP8 e4m3 block-scaled, FP4 routed experts)
Editrank-1 orthogonal projection, λ = 2.0, on 43 × layers.*.attn.wo_b (weight + scale, 86 tensors) — MTP/DSpark draft NOT edited
Untouchedrouted + shared experts, wo_a, embed, head, routers, norms, entire 32-layer vision tower + bias_vl, all mHC params, MTP draft
Sizethis repo: 1.44 GB overlay (+ base ~157 GB required)
RuntimevLLM (fraserpricee/vllm:dspark-cu132-vision), TP=2 across 2× RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Sources (methods, references & provenance)

Foundational method — cebeuq-style overlay: cebeuq/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-abliterated — the "residual direction + FP8 block-scaled projection, edit only attn.wo_b, ship as a tensor overlay + repointed index" recipe this repo follows.

Community ablits of the same base (consulted for recipe decisions):

Where this repo differs (decided by our own A/B behaviour study, not inherited):

  • Layer range: all 43 layers (community favours L10–35 / 26 layers). Our 2×2 study {43/26} × {λ2.0/λ3.5}, all with MTP untouched, showed 43 layers is decisively better on thinking-mode generation (43-version converged 3/4 @8 k on high-difficulty prompts; 26-layer versions blew past the budget to 12k–17k chars). Early/26-layer truncation is a real cost on this checkpoint.
  • λ = 2.0 (community uses 3.5). λ is model-specific; 3.5 gave no extra un-lock and degraded thinking on this checkpoint; 2.0 is the inversion point (see λ table below).
  • MTP not edited (same as community; see version note above).

Our own direction-capture and bake method: forward hooks on all 43 attn.wo_b over AdvBench-harmful vs Alpaca-harmless prompts in all three reasoning modes (chat/think-high/think-max), merged per layer, then W ← W − λ·r̂(r̂ᵀW) on the FP8 e4m3 block-scaled weights (dequantize → project → re-quantize holding original block exponents fixed), emitted as an overlay.


Validation (measured on this release, bayes-l2.0)

Refusal (chat, n=48)

Base Vision-ExpThis model (v2)
Safety refusals22/240/48 (1 raw detector hit cleared as a modality misfire — "I'm a text-based AI, I can't create a video file", then still gives the full tutorial)

n=300 refusal mass-scan was run on v1 (0.0 % across 7 raw hits, 6 mismatch + 1 ideological stance). The recipe change (drop MTP, keep λ=2.0, same 43-layer projection) is narrow; that v1 n=300 figure and this v2 n=48 agree — 0 safety refusals.

Long-generation behaviour (8192 thinking budget, high-difficulty probes) — three-way contrast

SampleBasev2 (bayes-l2.0)v1 (92-tensor, MTP-edited)
trigger_turn2✓✓✓
explain_qm✓✓✗ (div.)
write_code✗ (div., model-inherent)✗ (div., model-inherent)✗ (div.)
math_derivation✓✓✓
Score3/43/42/4

No garbling / quote-storm on v2. The single divergence (write_code, a long-code task) is inherent to the model, not to ablation — it diverges identically on the unedited base. v1 (MTP-edited) is actually worse (2/4). Dropping MTP produced no text-coherence regression and removed a failure.

Vision

BaseThis model (v2)
Visual descriptionrefuses / obfuscatesdescribes fully (colour-block image). Visual path decensors despite the text-side-only edit (see Findings).

Tool-calling (measured on this release)

Tool compliance: 6/6 = 1.000 (n=6, 3 tools; identical to base). Because the overlay only changes weight values (never the computation graph), throughput is expected unchanged from base (~75 tok/s single-stream; DSpark draft acceptance normal on v2, see Findings). v2 throughput bench was not re-run.


The λ operating envelope (calibrated on this checkpoint, not inherited)

λResult
3.0Too strong. Long-generation garbling / semantic break. Reject.
2.5Equivalent to 2.0 on the 8 k ruler (same score) but no added unlock here; no benefit over 2.0.
2.0Selected. Full inversion point (`
1.9Under-inversion fuzzy band (half-refuse / half-comply). Reject.
2.05–2.3e4m3 quant dead-zone — edits swallowed by rounding. Avoid.

Do not inherit λ from other checkpoints. 2.0 is this checkpoint's clean operating point; the 0731 text sibling's λ=2.5 and the community's λ=3.5 do not transfer here.


Serving (vLLM, 2× RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell)

The full model (~157 GB + overlay) needs both 96 GB cards, TP=2. The overlay dir's 48 shards are relative symlinks to /mnt/ubuntulibs/models/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp/, so the container must mirror-mount both /mnt/ubuntulib and /mnt/ubuntulibs (or the symlinks break and the engine crashes with FileNotFoundError):

docker run -d --name ds4-vision-abl --ipc=host --shm-size 32g --gpus all --restart unless-stopped \
  -p 5001:8000 \
  -v /mnt/ubuntulib:/mnt/ubuntulib:ro \
  -v /mnt/ubuntulibs:/mnt/ubuntulibs:ro \
  -v /data:/data \
  fraserpricee/vllm:dspark-cu132-vision \
  /opt/venv/bin/python -m vllm.entrypoints.cli.main serve /mnt/ubuntulib/models/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp-abliterated \
  --served-model-name DeepSeek-Vision-EXP-abliterated --trust-remote-code \
  --tensor-parallel-size 2 --gpu-memory-utilization 0.95 \
  --max-model-len 524288 --max-num-seqs 8 --max-num-batched-tokens 2048 \
  --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --block-size 256 --tokenizer-mode deepseek_v4 \
  --attention-backend FLASHINFER_MLA_SPARSE_DSV4 \
  --kernel-config.moe_backend flashinfer_cutlass \
  --speculative-config '{"method":"dspark","num_speculative_tokens":4,"draft_sample_method":"greedy"}' \
  --enable-flashinfer-autotune \
  --compilation-config '{"cudagraph_mode":"FULL_AND_PIECEWISE","custom_ops":["all"]}' \
  --enable-prefix-caching --enable-chunked-prefill --async-scheduling \
  --reasoning-parser deepseek_v4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser deepseek_v4 \
  --allowed-local-media-path /data

Findings

  • Text-path edit also decensors the visual path. All 86 edited tensors are text-backbone attn.wo_b; the 32-layer vision tower and bias_vl are byte-identical. Yet the model answers visual prompts without refusal (see Validation) — the generation head decodes from a fused carrier whose wo_b was edited.
  • Dropping MTP is strictly better here. v2 (MTP untouched) scored 3/4 on the 8 k ruler vs v1's (MTP-edited) 2/4, with DSpark draft acceptance confirmed working — no "must edit the drafter to unlock" effect.
  • 43 layers beats the community's 26. On thinking-mode generation, 43-layer edited versions converge (1.4k–7.8k chars) while 26-layer versions blow the budget (12k–17k chars).
  • A baked FP8 edit is weaker than a runtime hook (most elements round back); the e4m3 dead zone (λ ∈ [2.05, 2.3]) exists on this checkpoint — tune λ on the baked weights, never inherit.

Limitations

  • Capability gated on refusal / coherence / multi-turn / tool-call / serving only. MMLU-Pro, GSM8K, HumanEval, etc. were not run on this checkpoint.
  • Long-context unvalidated past multi-turn depth (8 turns) — no 168 k needle test.
  • Refusal scored by marker matching on the parsed answer + manual review; will miss phrasings outside the marker set.
  • write_code long-generation divergence is the one confirmed regression — but it is model-inherent (present on the unedited base too), not an ablation artifact.
  • v2 n is small (refusal n=48, ruler 4-prompt contrast, tool n=6); direction agrees with v1 and the community but a large-n re-run was not done for v2.
  • λ=2.0 is calibrated for the baked FP8 weights of this checkpoint only. Do not inherit.

Files

FileSizeNote
model-overlay-00001-of-00001.safetensors1.44 GBthe only differing weight file (86 tensors)
model.safetensors.index.json5.4 MBrepointed — 86 keys → overlay, 72,547 → base shard names
abliteration_report.json27 KBper-tensor edit audit (sha256 / clamped / overflow counts)
config.json / configuration.json / generation_config.json—architecture
tokenizer.json / tokenizer_config.json6.4 MBDeepSeek V4 tokenizer
encoding/encoding_dsv4.py29 KBofficial V4 prompt encoder (needed for correct chat formatting)
LICENSE—MIT

The 48 base shards are NOT in this repo. Download them from the base model, add this repo's overlay + repointed index into the same directory, and load. Removing the overlay + restoring the base index fully reverts the model.

Как запустить

На своей GPU в ailist. Цена — по текущим предложениям провайдеров

GPU в ailist

vLLM

Можно запустить

Подбираем GPU…

Класс архитектуры
DeepseekV4ForCausalLM
Ревизия весов
ec08535

0 моделей