Gemma-3-4B Market Analyst — Merged Model

A fully merged fine-tune of google/gemma-3-4b-it trained by Ramailo Technologies to perform structured financial market analysis across crypto, stocks, forex, and commodities.

This is the merged model — base weights + LoRA adapter baked into one. No separate adapter needed. Plug and play.
Looking for just the LoRA adapter (~65 MB)? → Ramailo-Technologies/gemma3-4b-market-analyst

What it does

Given structured market data (candles, RSI, MACD, Bollinger Bands, EMA stack, funding rates, put/call ratios, open interest, volume ratios), the model produces analysis across 7 task types:

Supported asset classes: crypto, stocks, forex, commodities

How to use

from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
import torch

model_id = "Ramailo-Technologies/gemma3-4b-market-analyst-merged"

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    model_id,
    torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
    device_map="auto",
)
model.eval()

messages = [
    {
        "role": "system",
        "content": "You are an expert market analyst. Analyse the provided market data and give a structured, condition-based assessment. Never give hard price targets. Always state what would change your bias."
    },
    {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Market data:\n<your JSON market data here>\n\nIs this a valid long setup or a trap?"
    }
]

inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
    messages, return_tensors="pt", add_generation_prompt=True
).to(model.device)

with torch.no_grad():
    output = model.generate(inputs, max_new_tokens=512, do_sample=False)

response = tokenizer.decode(output[0][inputs.shape[-1]:], skip_special_tokens=True)
print(response)

Training data examples

Example 1 — Setup Evaluation (BNB/USDT, 5m)

User prompt (abbreviated):

{
  "exchange": "binance",
  "symbol": "BNB/USDT",
  "timeframe": "5m",
  "indicators": {
    "rsi": 30,
    "bollinger_lower": 2684.93,
    "funding_rate": -0.0469,
    "long_short_ratio": 2.09,
    "price": 2635.74
  }
}

Is this a valid long setup or a falling knife?

Model response:

This is a textbook 'falling knife' scenario. While the price of 2635.74 is
aggressively oversold — sitting well below the lower Bollinger Band (2684.93)
and hitting an RSI of 30 — the sentiment data suggests a dangerous trap.
The Long/Short ratio of 2.09 is the critical signal here; it indicates that
retail traders are heavily positioned for a bounce. In a downtrend, a high
L/S ratio provides the exact liquidity needed for further declines via long
liquidations. The negative funding rate (-0.0469) confirms that shorts are
paying longs, which often precedes a bounce — but not when the long-side is
this overcrowded.

Bias change condition: A valid long setup would require the L/S ratio to drop
below 1.2 and price to reclaim the lower Bollinger Band (2684.93) on a
closing basis.

Example 2 — Risk Reading (NFLX, 15m)

User prompt (abbreviated):

{
  "exchange": "nasdaq",
  "symbol": "NFLX",
  "timeframe": "15m",
  "indicators": {
    "volume_ratio": 3.67,
    "put_call_ratio": 1.5,
    "ema_20": 688.22,
    "price": 669.81
  }
}

What does the volume spike tell us?

Model response:

The spike in volume ratio to 3.67 while price remains stagnant at 669.81 is
a classic signal of 'churning' or distribution. When volume surges but price
fails to move, it indicates a massive battle between buyers and sellers where
supply is exactly meeting demand. The Put/Call ratio of 1.5 is the deciding
factor — it reveals that the volume spike is driven largely by bearish bets
and hedging. NFLX is in a precarious position, trading below its EMA_20
(688.22).

Bias change condition: Bias turns neutral if price closes above EMA_20
(688.22) with a volume ratio below 2.0, signalling distribution pressure
is exhausting.

Evaluation results

Evaluated on 84 held-out samples across all task types and asset classes. GPT-4o was used as judge, scoring each response 1–5 on five criteria.

Overall — before vs after fine-tuning

The biggest gain is bias change condition (+2.68) — the base model almost never stated what would change its view. The fine-tuned model does this consistently on every response.

By task type

By asset class

Before vs after — response comparison

NFLX — Asset Comparison (delta: +2.2)

Base model (score: 2.8/5)

Okay, let's break down this NFLX data and assess whether this presents a
genuine short setup or a potential "fake-out."

1. Immediate Price Action & Volatility:
- Range: The stock has traded between 241.21 and 264.48.
- Volatility: The ATR of 4.15 indicates moderate volatility.
[Generic bullets with no directional conviction and no bias change condition]

Fine-tuned model (score: 5.0/5)

This is a valid short setup, not a fake-out. The conflict between the
put/call ratio (0.44) and the RSI (67.3) is a classic divergence. A put/call
ratio of 0.44 indicates extreme bullish sentiment, while the RSI of 67.3
shows the asset is overbought. When the options market is this aggressively
bullish while price is consolidating and the MACD histogram is negative
(-5.988), it suggests that 'smart money' is positioning for a reversal.
Price is trading below all major EMAs: EMA_20 (259.78), EMA_50 (277.25).

Bias change condition: Short bias invalidated if price closes above EMA_20
(259.78) with a put/call ratio rising above 0.6.

META — API Parse (delta: +2.2)

Base model (score: 2.2/5)

Based on the provided data, the options flow indicates "mixed" unusual
activity. The put-call ratio is 0.71, suggesting a slight preference for
puts. A cautious approach is advised...
[No specific data references, no bias change condition stated]

Fine-tuned model (score: 4.4/5)

I cannot provide a directional call on the 1H chart because the data is
contradictory. The Put/Call ratio is 0.71 (bullish), yet the IV Rank is
extremely high at 86.6. An IV Rank this high indicates the market expects a
massive volatility move, but the Put/Call ratio suggests no conviction in a
specific direction.

Bias change condition: A directional call becomes possible if IV Rank drops
below 60 while the Put/Call ratio holds above 0.8, or if a clear break
occurs above/below the consolidation range with a volume ratio above 2.0.

Training details

Limitations

• Trained primarily on crypto data — crypto task scores are highest (+1.32 delta). Stock/forex/commodities performance, while improved, may be less consistent on edge cases.
• The model analyses data it is given — it has no live market access.
• Not financial advice. All outputs are for research and educational purposes only.
• Performance depends on the quality and completeness of the market data JSON provided as input.

Developed by

Ramailo Technologies