/ Модель

Характеристики

Лицензия
Apache 2.0
Библиотека
transformers
Опубликована
21 июн 2026

gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic-GGUF

Генерация текстаТекст → текст9 профессий

Это GGUF-версия модели llmfan46/gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic, разработанная независимым автором llmfan46 на базе gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-GGUF.

31 635скачиваний за 30 дней56лайковвеса обновлены30 июн 2026

Бенчмарки

Как модель справилась с задачами пользователей ailist и что о ней публикуют открытые лидерборды

Публичные оценки

Из открытых лидербордов. Сравнивайте результаты одного теста при одинаковых условиях — отсутствие оценки не значит, что модель хуже.

В подключённых источниках результатов для этой модели пока нет.

Что умеет модель

Описание составлено по карточке модели и метаданным Hugging Face

Модель предназначена прежде всего для генерации и анализа кода, рассуждений и текстовых ответов в сценариях, где требуется сниженное количество отказов. Точная архитектура, поддерживаемые языки, размер контекста и набор модальностей в README не указаны; из идентификатора следует размер порядка 12B параметров и специализация на задачах программирования.

Модель создана с использованием Heretic v1.4.0 и варианта метода Magnitude-Preserving Orthogonal Ablation (MPOA), применённого к компонентам attn.o_proj и mlp.down_proj. По заявленным данным, она демонстрирует 9 отказов из 100 против 100 из 100 у исходной модели при KL divergence 0.0467, что указывает на существенное снижение склонности к отказам при относительно небольшом отклонении поведения. Для исходной модели также приведён результат MMLU: точность 75,72%, однако отдельный результат именно этой модификации не указан.

К ограничениям относятся отсутствие подробной информации о языках, контекстном окне, формате квантования, системных требованиях и результатах независимого тестирования. Снижение ограничений безопасности может привести к генерации нежелательного или рискованного содержания, поэтому модель требует осторожного применения. Указанная лицензия — Apache-2.0.

Для каких профессий подходит9

Разделы каталога профессий, в задачах которых используется эта модель

Все профессии

Также подходит для

Карточка модели

README от автора на Hugging Face, как он его опубликовал

Открыть на Hugging Face

91% fewer refusals (9/100 Uncensored vs 100/100 Original) while preserving model quality (0.0467 KL divergence).

❤️ Support My Work

Creating these models takes significant time, work and compute. If you find them useful consider supporting me:

image/png

PlatformLinkWhat you get
🎉 PatreonMonthly supportPriority model requests
☕ Ko-fiOne-time tipMy eternal gratitude

Your help will motivate me and would go into further improving my workflow and coverings fees for storage, compute and may even help uncensoring bigger model with rental Cloud GPUs.


GGUF quantizations of llmfan46/gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic.

This is a decensored version of yuxinlu1/gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-GGUF, made using Heretic v1.4.0 with a variant of the Magnitude-Preserving Orthogonal Ablation (MPOA) method

Abliteration parameters

ParameterValue
direction_index28.81
attn.o_proj.max_weight0.93
attn.o_proj.max_weight_position28.53
attn.o_proj.min_weight0.87
attn.o_proj.min_weight_distance25.58
mlp.down_proj.max_weight1.37
mlp.down_proj.max_weight_position33.47
mlp.down_proj.min_weight0.28
mlp.down_proj.min_weight_distance26.41

Targeted components

  • attn.o_proj
  • mlp.down_proj

Performance

MetricThis modelOriginal model (gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-GGUF)
KL divergence0.04670 (by definition)
Refusals✅ 9/100❌ 100/100

MMLU test results:

Original:

============================================================

  • Total questions: 7021

  • Correct: 5316

  • Accuracy: 0.7572 (75.72%)

  • Parse failures: 90

============================================================

Tested subject scores:

  • professional_law: 0.5987 (470/785)
  • moral_scenarios: 0.6606 (292/442)
  • miscellaneous: 0.8642 (331/383)
  • professional_psychology: 0.8070 (255/316)
  • high_school_psychology: 0.9111 (246/270)
  • high_school_macroeconomics: 0.8325 (164/197)
  • elementary_mathematics: 0.8152 (150/184)
  • moral_disputes: 0.7874 (137/174)
  • prehistory: 0.8488 (146/172)
  • philosophy: 0.7862 (125/159)
  • high_school_biology: 0.9211 (140/152)
  • professional_accounting: 0.6434 (92/143)
  • clinical_knowledge: 0.8286 (116/140)
  • high_school_microeconomics: 0.8750 (119/136)
  • nutrition: 0.7926 (107/135)
  • professional_medicine: 0.7910 (106/134)
  • conceptual_physics: 0.8125 (104/128)
  • high_school_mathematics: 0.3622 (46/127)
  • human_aging: 0.7155 (83/116)
  • security_studies: 0.7857 (88/112)
  • high_school_statistics: 0.7027 (78/111)
  • marketing: 0.9266 (101/109)
  • high_school_world_history: 0.8774 (93/106)
  • sociology: 0.8641 (89/103)
  • high_school_government_and_politics: 0.9109 (92/101)
  • high_school_geography: 0.8990 (89/99)
  • high_school_chemistry: 0.7216 (70/97)
  • high_school_us_history: 0.8526 (81/95)
  • virology: 0.4944 (44/89)
  • college_medicine: 0.8068 (71/88)
  • world_religions: 0.8295 (73/88)
  • high_school_physics: 0.5952 (50/84)
  • electrical_engineering: 0.6667 (54/81)
  • astronomy: 0.8481 (67/79)
  • logical_fallacies: 0.8158 (62/76)
  • high_school_european_history: 0.8219 (60/73)
  • anatomy: 0.7465 (53/71)
  • college_biology: 0.8750 (56/64)
  • human_sexuality: 0.8281 (53/64)
  • formal_logic: 0.6094 (39/64)
  • public_relations: 0.7213 (44/61)
  • international_law: 0.8833 (53/60)
  • college_physics: 0.4912 (28/57)
  • college_mathematics: 0.4364 (24/55)
  • econometrics: 0.7037 (38/54)
  • jurisprudence: 0.7736 (41/53)
  • high_school_computer_science: 0.9038 (47/52)
  • machine_learning: 0.7308 (38/52)
  • medical_genetics: 0.8824 (45/51)
  • global_facts: 0.5098 (26/51)
  • management: 0.9400 (47/50)
  • us_foreign_policy: 0.9400 (47/50)
  • college_chemistry: 0.4255 (20/47)
  • abstract_algebra: 0.5532 (26/47)
  • business_ethics: 0.7174 (33/46)
  • college_computer_science: 0.7333 (33/45)
  • computer_security: 0.7907 (34/43)

Heretic:

============================================================

  • Total questions: 7021

  • Correct: 5276

  • Accuracy: 0.7515 (75.15%)

  • Parse failures: 97

============================================================

Tested subject scores:

  • professional_law: 0.5847 (459/785)
  • moral_scenarios: 0.6335 (280/442)
  • miscellaneous: 0.8642 (331/383)
  • professional_psychology: 0.7975 (252/316)
  • high_school_psychology: 0.9148 (247/270)
  • high_school_macroeconomics: 0.8274 (163/197)
  • elementary_mathematics: 0.8152 (150/184)
  • moral_disputes: 0.7931 (138/174)
  • prehistory: 0.8547 (147/172)
  • philosophy: 0.7799 (124/159)
  • high_school_biology: 0.9079 (138/152)
  • professional_accounting: 0.6294 (90/143)
  • clinical_knowledge: 0.8143 (114/140)
  • high_school_microeconomics: 0.8676 (118/136)
  • nutrition: 0.8000 (108/135)
  • professional_medicine: 0.7537 (101/134)
  • conceptual_physics: 0.7891 (101/128)
  • high_school_mathematics: 0.3622 (46/127)
  • human_aging: 0.7241 (84/116)
  • security_studies: 0.8125 (91/112)
  • high_school_statistics: 0.6847 (76/111)
  • marketing: 0.9174 (100/109)
  • high_school_world_history: 0.8774 (93/106)
  • sociology: 0.8835 (91/103)
  • high_school_government_and_politics: 0.9109 (92/101)
  • high_school_geography: 0.8889 (88/99)
  • high_school_chemistry: 0.7216 (70/97)
  • high_school_us_history: 0.8421 (80/95)
  • virology: 0.4607 (41/89)
  • college_medicine: 0.7841 (69/88)
  • world_religions: 0.8182 (72/88)
  • high_school_physics: 0.5595 (47/84)
  • electrical_engineering: 0.6543 (53/81)
  • astronomy: 0.8734 (69/79)
  • logical_fallacies: 0.8553 (65/76)
  • high_school_european_history: 0.8082 (59/73)
  • anatomy: 0.7606 (54/71)
  • college_biology: 0.8906 (57/64)
  • human_sexuality: 0.8125 (52/64)
  • formal_logic: 0.5938 (38/64)
  • public_relations: 0.6721 (41/61)
  • international_law: 0.9000 (54/60)
  • college_physics: 0.5263 (30/57)
  • college_mathematics: 0.4182 (23/55)
  • econometrics: 0.7037 (38/54)
  • jurisprudence: 0.7736 (41/53)
  • high_school_computer_science: 0.9038 (47/52)
  • machine_learning: 0.7115 (37/52)
  • medical_genetics: 0.8627 (44/51)
  • global_facts: 0.5686 (29/51)
  • management: 0.9200 (46/50)
  • us_foreign_policy: 0.9600 (48/50)
  • college_chemistry: 0.3830 (18/47)
  • abstract_algebra: 0.6170 (29/47)
  • business_ethics: 0.7609 (35/46)
  • college_computer_science: 0.7556 (34/45)
  • computer_security: 0.7907 (34/43)

MMLU - Massive Multitask Language Understanding, multiple-choice questions across 57 subjects (math, history, law, medicine, etc.).


Quantizations

FilenameQuantDescription
gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic-F16.ggufF16Full precision
gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic-Q8_0.ggufQ8_0Near-lossless, recommended
gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic-Q6_K.ggufQ6_KExcellent quality
gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic-Q5_K_M.ggufQ5_K_MGood balance
gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic-Q5_K_S.ggufQ5_K_SSmaller Q5
gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic-Q4_K_M.ggufQ4_K_MGood for limited VRAM

Vision Projector

FilenameQuantDescription
gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1-uncensored-heretic-mmproj-F16.ggufF16Native precision

A Vision Projector File is Required for vision/multimodal capabilities. Use alongside any quantization above.

Usage

Works with llama.cpp, LM Studio, Ollama, and other GGUF-compatible tools.


💻 Gemma4-12B-Coder (GGUF) — Composer 2.5 × Fable 5 ✨

🐣 Tiny footprint, big brain — a local coding model for everyone

No matter your GPU. No matter your RAM. If you've got ~4.5 GB of VRAM or unified memory free, you can run your own private, offline coding assistant right now. 🚀 This is the v1 / code edition — distilled from real chain-of-thought so it thinks through a problem before writing the solution. 🧠💻 All local, all yours, no API, no cloud.

🎯 What it is

A focused fine-tune of Gemma 4 12B on verifiable Python coding data — every training example's reasoning leads to code that actually passed its tests. The result reasons in the open (edge cases, complexity, approach) and then emits a clean, runnable solution. 💚


📌 Announcements

🚀🔥 IT'S HERE — v2 is OUT NOW! v2 has shipped — the GGUF quants are live and ready to run → grab v2 here. 🎉 The full safetensors master (build / fine-tune on top) goes up tomorrow. v2 is agentic + coding focused — the piece v1 was missing.

Here's the result that got me most excited. When I saw v2's tau2-bench telecom result — an agentic tool-use benchmark where the model has to diagnose → fix → verify, exactly like real terminal/debugging work — I literally got launched out of my chair (…okay, kidding 😄). The jump in actually solving the problem is wild:

tau2-bench telecom · local, same harness, Q8_0score
official gemma-4-12B-it (base)~15%
🟢 v2 (this release)~55%

The base model tends to give up early (hands the problem off to a human); v2 keeps going and works it the way a much bigger model would. Full benchmark details are in the v2 card now. 🔧

✅ safetensors master (this v1 model) is UP. Full-precision weights are live → yuxinlu1/gemma-4-12B-coder-fable5-composer2.5-v1 — roll your own GGUF / MLX / AWQ quants or fine-tune straight from the master. 🎉


📣 Context length fixed: now 256K (was 131K) — thanks, community! 💚

A community member spotted that this model was reporting only a 131K context window. That turned out to be the well-known upstream Gemma 4 metadata bug — Google's initial config.json shipped with max_position_embeddings: 131072 instead of the real 262144 (256K), and that value got baked into a lot of downstream finetunes and quants (including this one) before it was fixed upstream.

The weights were always fine — it was purely a metadata field. All GGUF quants have been re-patched to the full 256K context (gemma4.context_length = 262144). Just re-download if you grabbed an earlier copy. 🙏


📚 Training data (the interesting part 🍳)

This is a distillation of two complementary chain-of-thought sources, both over verifiable Python coding tasks (algorithmic / function-level problems that come with deterministic tests):

  • 🥇 Main set — Composer 2.5 real CoT. Genuine, model-authored reasoning traces. The teacher solved each problem, its code was run against the task's tests, and only the passing solutions were kept. So the reasoning you're learning from leads to code that actually works.
  • 🥈 Aux set — Fable 5 (released today! 🎉). A clever twist: we took the problems where Composer 2.5 got it wrong and handed them to Fable 5 to redo — re-deriving a fresh, self-consistent chain-of-thought and a correct solution, again gated on passing the tests. This recovers the hard cases the main teacher missed. These traces are synthetic (rationalized CoT), and are tagged separately so the two sources stay distinguishable.

The recipe: real CoT for the bulk of solid coverage, plus synthetic "second-attempt" CoT to patch the failures — both verified by execution before anything entered training. ✅


📦 Pick your size (GGUF quants)

QuantSizeVibe
🟢 Q2_K4.5 GBtiniest — runs almost anywhere
🟡 Q3_K_M5.7 GBgreat for 8 GB VRAM — much better than Q2
🔵 Q4_K_M6.87 GBthe sweet spot 👌 (recommended)
🟣 Q6_K9.11 GBnear-lossless
⚪ Q8_011.8 GBbasically full quality

🧮 "Will it fit?" — context length cheat-sheet

Rough estimates 🤓 (assumes q8_0 KV cache + ~1.5 GB overhead; use q4_0 KV cache for ≈2× more context!). Max context is 256K. "—" = won't fit, pick a smaller quant. ✂️

Your VRAM / unified mem🟢 Q2_K (4.5G)🟡 Q3_K_M (5.7G)🔵 Q4_K_M (6.87G)🟣 Q6_K (9.11G)⚪ Q8_0 (11.8G)
8 GB~16K ctx~10Ktight (~2–4K)——
12 GB~48K~38K~30K~12K—
16 GB~80K~72K~64K~44K~22K
24 GB~200K~160K~128K~110K~88K
32 GB256K (max) 🎉256K256K~230K~190K

💡 Apple Silicon / integrated GPUs with unified memory count too — same numbers, just slower than a dGPU. 💡 Low on room? Drop a quant or switch KV cache to q4_0 and your context roughly doubles.


🚀 How to run it (super easy)

Option A — llama.cpp (recommended) 🦙

  1. Grab a quant above (e.g. …-Q4_K_M.gguf) and llama-server from llama.cpp.

    ⚠️ Needs a recent llama.cpp (this is the gemma4_unified architecture — older builds won't load it).

  2. Run a server (Windows .bat shown — tweak --port, --ctx-size to taste):
@echo off
cd /d C:\llama.cpp
llama-server.exe ^
  -m C:\models\gemma4-coding-Q4_K_M.gguf ^
  --ctx-size 16384 ^
  --n-gpu-layers 99 ^
  --no-mmap ^
  -fa on ^
  --cache-type-k q8_0 --cache-type-v q8_0 ^
  --temp 1.0 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 64 ^
  --host 0.0.0.0 --port 18080
pause
  1. Open http://localhost:18080 and chat. 🎉 (Tip: bump --ctx-size per the table; use q4_0 KV for more.)

Option B — one-click apps 🖱️

Works in LM Studio, Jan, Ollama, etc. — just import the GGUF, pick your quant, go. 🐾

🧠 Thinking mode

This model thinks in Gemma's native thought channel before answering — exactly how it was trained. Keep enable_thinking=true (the default chat template handles it). Recommended sampling: temp 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 64. For coding you can also go greedy (temp 0) for more deterministic solutions.


⚠️ Good to know

  • Reduced refusals: the training data is task-focused with no safety hedging, so this refuses less than the base model. It is not safety-aligned — add your own guardrails for production. Use responsibly. 🙏
  • Specialized for Python / algorithmic coding. Reasoning quality is strongest in that domain; general-knowledge facts/numbers should still be double-checked.
  • English-centric.

📚 Base & License

  • License: Apache 2.0. Gemma 4 is released by Google under Apache 2.0 (unlike the older Gemma 1/2/3 terms), so this fine-tune is Apache 2.0 too — free to use, modify, and redistribute. 🎉
  • Base model: google/gemma-4-12B-it.
  • Personal/hobby project — shared as-is, no warranty. Have fun, and happy hacking! 🐾✨

Как запустить

На своей GPU в ailist. Цена — по текущим предложениям провайдеров

GPU в ailist

llama.cpp

Нельзя запустить

GGUF-модель ждёт проверки: нужно выбрать файл кванта под доступные GPU.

Ревизия весов
35d7938

0 моделей