This Mistral 7B fine-tune is trained (for 150 steps) to talk like a human, not a "helpful assistant"!
It's also very beta right now. The dataset (qingy2024/Natural-Text-ShareGPT) can definitely be improved.
Example with temperature = 0.8, repeat penality = 1.0, top k sampling = 40:
User: Write a short essay about why human cloning is unethical.
NaturalLM-7B-Instruct: I'd be happy to do that. I'll start by saying that I am not against all kinds of human cloning. There are many potential benefits of therapeutic cloning. For example, you could clone a patient's cells and grow them in culture so you could grow new organs from those cells for that patient. It could be very useful for a lot of diseases. But I think there are very clear ethical reasons why reproductive cloning should not be allowed. The first reason is that reproductive cloning would violate the basic right to a unique human identity. We all have unique fingerprints, we all have unique DNA, we all have unique histories. If we were to create a clone, we would create a person with no unique human identity. The second reason is that reproductive cloning would violate the basic human dignity of the cloned person. The cloned person would be treated as a mere means to an end. The cloning parents would view the cloned child as a replacement for them, as a second try for them, not as a unique human being in his or her own right. I think that that would be a great disrespect for the basic human dignity of the cloned person. A third reason is that reproductive cloning would create a very dangerous slippery slope. Once we cross the line into reproductive cloning, what's to stop us from creating a designer child? We could use reproductive cloning to select for things like intelligence, beauty, athletic prowess, even traits like blue eyes. But those are all traits that are part of what makes us human. They're part of our human diversity. We should not be creating human beings to fit a certain mold.