Notes on Visual Question Answering
Repository summary
This is an exploratory note for Visual Question Answering. It records the intended comparison, likely confounders, and reproducibility requirements before any benchmark result is reported.
What is covered
- the scope of the research question and likely confounders
- a proposed comparison with matched baselines
- concrete evaluation context such as VQAv2, GQA, and OK-VQA
- reproducibility checks, failure modes, and open questions
- topic-relevant references
How to read this repository
Start with review.md for the full note. Sections labeled as plans or hypotheses should not be interpreted as experimental results. If results are added later, they should include dataset versions, commands, seeds, hardware, and raw logs.
Scope and limitations
The note is intentionally exploratory. It does not claim benchmark improvements, completed ablations, released code, or a trained checkpoint. References and proposed datasets provide a starting point for verification rather than evidence that the study has already been run.
Files
review.md— primary artifactREADME.md— this documentation
License
Released under mit. Review the source-data terms separately when this repository is used with external datasets.