/ Модель

Характеристики

Контекст
16 384 токена
Параметры
2,6 млрд
Размер весов
10,4 ГБ
Лицензия
Apache 2.0
Архитектура
Motif · dense
Опубликована
6 июн 2025

Motif-2.6B

Генерация текстаТекст → текст6 профессий

Motif 2.6B — компактная языковая модель для генерации текста и диалоговых приложений на английском и корейском языках.

563скачиваний за 30 дней88лайковвеса обновлены28 авг 2025

Бенчмарки

Как модель справилась с задачами пользователей ailist и что о ней публикуют открытые лидерборды

Публичные оценки

Из открытых лидербордов. Сравнивайте результаты одного теста при одинаковых условиях — отсутствие оценки не значит, что модель хуже.

В подключённых источниках результатов для этой модели пока нет.

Что умеет модель

Описание составлено по карточке модели и метаданным Hugging Face

Motif 2.6B — плотная авторегрессионная языковая модель с 2,6 млрд параметров, разработанная Motif Technologies и обученная с нуля на 2,4 трлн токенов. Она предназначена для генерации текста и диалогового взаимодействия; разработчики позиционируют её как компактную модель общего назначения. Модель обучалась на ускорителях AMD Instinct MI250, а заявленная длина контекста составляет 16 384 токена. В карточке указаны английский и корейский языки.

Модель подходит для чат-ботов, генерации и продолжения текста, а также для экспериментов с компактными языковыми моделями. В README приведены результаты сравнительных тестов, однако показатели получены в разных условиях и по данным публикаций разработчиков сравниваемых моделей, поэтому их следует интерпретировать осторожно. Для загрузки через Transformers карточка приводит пример с AutoModelForCausalLM и trust_remote_code=True.

Весы опубликованы в формате safetensors по лицензии Apache-2.0. Модель обучена с нуля и не указана как производная от другой базовой модели.

Сценарии применения

  • создание чат-бота общего назначения
  • генерация и продолжение текстов
  • подготовка черновиков и ответов на английском
  • генерация диалоговых реплик на корейском
  • эксперименты с компактными языковыми моделями

Ограничения

В README отмечены существенные различия в условиях оценки между опубликованными бенчмарками, поэтому прямые сравнения результатов ограничены. Карточка требует trust_remote_code=True для приведённого способа загрузки через Transformers.

Для каких профессий подходит6

Разделы каталога профессий, в задачах которых используется эта модель

Все профессии

Также подходит для

Карточка модели

README от автора на Hugging Face, как он его опубликовал

Открыть на Hugging Face

Last update: 14th august 2025

New

Now you can try out Motif 2.6B on Model Hub: https://model-hub.motiftech.io/

Select 'Motif 2.6B' from the dropdown next to the Send button.

Introduction

We announce Motif 2.6B, a 2.6 billion parameter language model trained from scratch on AMD Instinct™ MI250 GPUs. Motif 2.6B marks our very first step toward building helpful, reliable AI aligned with human values. With this initial release, our goal is for Motif 2.6B to match the performance of well-known open-source models such as Gemma, Llama, and Phi — particularly those in the sLLM regime.
For more details, you can refer to our technical report.

Training information

  • GPUs: 384 MI250
  • Training time: 42 days
  • Training data: 2.4T tokens

Evaluation

When models are released, their accompanying technical reports or papers often present benchmark results based on evaluation settings chosen by the developers. While this is a common and understandable practice, it can lead to challenges when comparing models across different organizations. The same model may yield different scores depending on evaluation conditions, and details of these conditions are not always fully disclosed. This lack of standardization can make it difficult for the open-source community to interpret and trust reported results. We therefore reference performance scores based on the official numbers reported by each model’s developers in their respective publications.

To illustrate how much evaluation scores can vary across reports, we provide concrete examples of benchmark score differences for major models in the Evaluation Appendix.

Comparison to Mistral 7B by Mistral AI

The benchmarks and corresponding scores listed in the table below are taken directly from the Mistral 7B technical report.

BenchmarkMetricMistral 7BMotif 2.6BImprovement
MMLU5-shot60.157.93-3.61%
HellaSwag0-shot81.361.35-24.54%
WinoG0-shot75.359.91-20.44%
PIQA0-shot8375.95-8.49%
Arc-e0-shot8087.21+9.01%
Arc-c0-shot55.574.2+33.69%
NQ5-shot28.811.14-61.32%
TriviaQA5-shot69.954.97-21.36%
HumanEval0-shot30.568.3+123.93%
MBPP3-shot47.560.3+26.95%
MATH4-shot, maj@413.140.2*+206.87%
GSM8K8-shot, maj@852.275.66**+44.94%
Average+25.47%

* : We report the 4-shot, maj@1 score instead of the 4-shot, maj@4. ** : We report the 8-shot, maj@1 score instead of the 8-shot, maj@8.

Comparison to the Gemma series by Google

Gemma 1 & 2

The benchmarks and corresponding scores listed in the table below are taken directly from the Gemma 2 technical report.

Note: Although referred to as "2B", Gemma 2 2B actually has 2.6 billion parameters.

BenchmarkMetricGemma 1 2BGemma 1 7BGemma 2 2BGemma 2 9BMotif 2.6BImprovement(over 1 1B)Improvement(over 1 7B)Improvement(over 2 2B)Improvement(over 2 9B)
MMLU5-shot42.364.452.271.357.93+36.95%-10.05%+10.98%-18.75%
ARC-C25-shot48.561.155.768.475.08+54.80%+22.88%+34.79%+9.77%
GSM8K5-shot15.151.824.368.675.13+397.55%+45.04%+309.18%+9.52%
AGIEval3-5-shot24.244.931.552.8-----
DROP3-shot, F148.556.351.269.429.33-39.53%-47.90%-42.71%-57.74%
BBH3-shot, CoT35.25941.968.248.5637.95%-17.69%+15.89%-28.80%
Winogrande5-shot66.87971.380.667.09+0.43%-15.08%-5.90%-16.76%
HellaSwag10-shot71.782.372.981.969.89-2.52%-15.08%-4.13%-14.66%
MATH4-shot11.824.31636.640.2+240.88%+65.43%+151.25%+9.84%
ARC-e0-shot73.281.580.68887.21+19.14%+7.01%+8.20%-0.90%
PIQA0-shot77.381.278.481.775.95-1.75%-6.47%-3.13%-7.04%
SIQA0-shot49.751.851.953.461.97+24.69%+19.63%+19.40%+16.05%
Boolq0-shot69.483.272.784.267.76-2.36%-18.56%-6.80%-19.52%
TriviaQA5-shot53.263.460.476.654.97+3.33%-13.30%-8.99%-28.24%
NQ5-shot12.52317.129.210.91-12.72%-52.57%-36.20%-62.64%
HumanEvalpass@12232.320.140.268.3+210.45%+111.46%+239.80%+69.90%
MBPP3-shot29.244.430.252.460.3+106.51%+35.81%+99.67%+15.08%
Average+90.79%+3.44%+46.17%-13.45%

Gemma 3

The benchmarks and corresponding scores listed in the table below are taken directly from the Gemma 3 technical report.

BenchmarkMetricGemma 3 1BGemma 3 4BMotif 2.6BImprovement(over 1B)Improvement(over 4B)
HellaS10-shot62.377.269.89+12.18%-9.47%
BoolQ0-shot63.272.367.76+7.22%-6.28%
PIQA0-shot73.879.675.59+2.43%-5.04%
SIQA0-shot48.951.961.97+26.73%+19.40%
TQA5-shot39.865.854.97+38.12%-16.46%
NQ5-shot9.482010.91+15.08%-45.45%
ARC-C25-shot38.456.275.08+95.52%+33.59%
ARC-E0-shot7382.487.21+19.47%+5.84%
WinoG5-shot58.264.767.09+15.27%+3.69%
BBHfew-shot, CoT28.450.948.56+70.99%-4.60%
Drop1-shot, F142.460.129.33-30.83%-51.20%
MMLU5-shot-59.657.93--2.80%
MMLUpro5-shot, CoT-29.2---
AGIE3-5-shot-42.1---
MATH4-shot, CoT-24.240.2-+66.12%
GSM8K8-shot, CoT-38.480.21-+108.88%
GPQA Diamond5-shot, CoT-1531.81-+112.07%
MBPP3-shot-4660.3-+31.09%
HumanE0-shot-3668.3-+89.72%
IFEval-80.290.274.02-7.71%-17.94%
Average+22.04%+17.29%

Comparison to the Llama series by Meta

Llama 3

The benchmarks and corresponding scores listed in the table below are taken directly from the Llama 3 technical report.

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3 8BMotif 2.6BImprovement
MMLU5-shot69.457.93-16.53%
MMLU0-shot, CoT7357.95-20.62%
MMLU-Pro5-shot, CoT48.3--
IFEval-80.474.02-7.94%
HumanEval0-shot72.668.3-5.92%
MBPP0-shot72.857.93-20.43%
GSM8K8-shot, CoT84.580.21-5.08%
MATH0-shot, CoT51.949.68-4.28%
ARC Challenge0-shot83.474.2-11.03%
GPQA0-shot, CoT32.818.53-43.51%
Average-15.04%

Llama 3.2

The benchmarks and corresponding scores listed in the table below are taken directly from the Llama 3.2 official blog.

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.2 1BLlama 3.2 3BMotif 2.6BImprovement(over 1B)Improvement(over 3B)
MMLU0-shot49.363.457.6+16.75%-9.21%
Open-rewrite eval*0-shot, rougeL41.640.1---
TLDR9+test, 1-shot, rougeL16.819---
IFEval-59.577.474.02+24.40%-4.37%
GSM8K8-shot, CoT44.477.780.21+80.65%+3.23%
MATH0-shot, CoT30.64849.68+62.35%+3.50%
ARC Challenge0-shot59.478.674.2+24.92%-5.6%
GPQA0-shot27.232.825.45-6.43%-22.41%
Hellaswag0-shot41.269.861.35+48.91%-12.11%
Average+41.82%-2.49%

Comparison to the Phi series by Microsoft

The benchmarks and corresponding scores listed in the table below are taken directly from the Phi-3 technical report.

BenchmarkMetricPhi-3 3.8BPhi-3 7BPhi-2 2.7BMotif 2.6BImprovement(over 3.8B)Improvement(over 7B)Improvement(over 2.7B)
MMLU5-shot68.875.756.357.93-15.80%-23.47%+2.90%
HellaSwag5-shot76.77753.668.97-10.08%-10.43%+28.68%
ANLI7-shot52.858.142.547.99-9.11%-17.40%+12.92%
GSM-8K8-shot, CoT82.589.661.180.21-2.78%-10.48%+31.28%
MATH0-shot, CoT41.334.6-49.68+20.29%+43.58%-
MedQA2-shot53.865.440.942.1-21.75%-35.63%+2.93%
AGIEval0-shot37.545.129.8----
TriviaQA5-shot6458.145.254.97-14.11%-5.39%+21.62%
Arc-C10-shot84.990.775.975.17-11.46%-17.12%-0.96%
Arc-E10-shot94.69788.588.64-6.30%-8.62%+0.16%
PIQA5-shot84.286.960.278.29-7.02%-9.91%+30.05%
SociQA5-shot76.679.268.366.73-12.89%-15.74%-2.3%
BigBench-Hard3-shot, CoT71.779.159.448.56-32.27%-38.61%-18.25%
WinoGrande5-shot70.881.554.767.09-5.24%-17.68%+22.65%
OpenBookQA10-shot83.28873.687.8+5.53%-0.23%+19.29%
BoolQ2-shot77.284.8-70.7-8.42%-16.63%-
CommonSenseQA10-shot80.28069.371.25-11.16%-10.94%2.81%
TruthfulQA10-shot6570.2-52.07-19.89%-25.83%-
HumanEval0-shot58.5615968.29+16.74%+11.95%+15.75%
MBPP3-shot7071.760.660.3-13.86%-15.90%-0.50%
GPQA2-shot, CoT32.834.3-27.9-14.94%-18.66%-
MT Bench2R. Avg.8.388.7-6.77-19.21%-22.18%-
Average-9.87%-13.25%+10.56%

Evaluation Appendix

In the comparisons presented above, Motif 2.6B showed average performance improvements of -15.36% and -13.45% over Llama 3 8B and Gemma 2 9B, respectively, based on the benchmark scores reported in their original technical reports. However, when compared to the benchmarks and scores reported in the Qwen 2.5 technical report, Motif 2.6B shows an average improvement of +19.27% over Llama 3 8B and +1.68% over Gemma 2 9B. See the table below for details.

Comparison to Llama 3 8B and Gemma 2 9B based on scores from the Qwen2.5 technical report

The benchmarks and corresponding scores listed in the table below are taken directly from the Qwen2.5 technical report.

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3 8BGemma 2 9BMotif 2.6BImprovement(over Llama 3 8B)Improvement(over Gemma 2 9B)
MMLU5-shot66.671.357.93-13.02%-18.75%
MMLU-pro5-shot35.444.728.4-19.77%-36.47%
MMLU-redux5-shot61.667.959.54-3.34%-12.31%
BBH3-shot57.768.239.28-31.92%-42.40%
ARC-C25-shot59.368.275.08+26.61%+10.09%
TruthfulQA0-shot4445.341.55-5.56%-8.27%
Winogrande5-shot77.479.567.09-13.32%-15.61%
HellaSwag10-shot82.181.969.88-14.88%-14.68%
GPQA5-shot25.832.829.24+13.33%-10.85%
TheoremQA5-shot22.128.9---
MATH4-shot20.537.740.2+96.10%+6.63%
MMLU-stem5-shot55.365.152.9-4.34%-18.74%
GSM8K4-shot55.370.775.2+35.99%+6.36%
HumanEval0-shot33.537.868.3+103.88%+80.69%
HumanEval+0-shot29.330.562.2+112.29%+103.93%
MBPP0-shot53.962.260.3+11.87%-3.05%
MBPP+0-shot44.450.650.8+14.41%+0.40%
MultiPL-E0-shot22.634.9---
Average+19.27%+1.68%

How to use

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    "Motif-Technologies/Motif-2.6B",
    trust_remote_code = True, 
    _attn_implementation = "eager", # also supports flash_attention_2
).cuda()

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(
    "Motif-Technologies/Motif-2.6B", 
    trust_remote_code = True, 
)

query = "What is the capital city of South Korea?"
input_ids = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
    [
        {'role': 'system', 'content': 'you are an helpful assistant'},
        {'role': 'user', 'content': query},
    ],
    add_generation_prompt = True,
    return_tensors='pt',
).cuda()

output = model.generate(input_ids, max_new_tokens=128, pad_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id)
output = tokenizer.decode(output[0, input_ids.shape[-1]:], skip_special_tokens = True)
print(output)

"""
The capital city of South Korea is Seoul. Located in the southern part of the country, Seoul is not only the largest city in South Korea but also one of the largest metropolitan areas in the world.
It is a vibrant and dynamic city known for its rich history, cultural heritage, and modern amenities. Seoul is a major economic, cultural, and political center in East Asia, and it plays a crucial role in the region's politics, economy, and culture.
The city is divided into different administrative districts, each with its own unique characteristics and attractions.
"""

Как запустить

На своей GPU в ailist. Цена — по текущим предложениям провайдеров

GPU в ailist

Универсальный рантайм

Нельзя запустить

Модели нужен код из репозитория; автор пока не в списке доверенных организаций.

Класс архитектуры
MotifForCausalLM
Ревизия весов
5b901f0

0 моделей